knowledge Books

This is a cogent short work on the central place of Hegel in modern philosophy, containing a crisp account of the transition between the era of Kant and his successors. So this book is also most usefully about the 'before and after' of Kant. The interest of this transition springs from the decisive character, almost a spell, of the Hegelian influence, in the wake of the crisis of critical thinking and the unsettled questions of foundationalism precipated by the reaction to the seminal work of Kant. Following the swift passage from Kant's system, through to the alternate universe of Hegelian logic and phenomenology, leaves a spellbinding enigma, whose outcome is never certain, witness the cascade of dialectical reversals of all the basic questions. From the critique of metaphysics to the Hegelian absolute science is a whitewater of dangerous currents, and this book tells its tale beautifully, for those who will follow the trail in the devout wish of being a philosopher.

I read this book for a graduate seminar on philosophy of art. Hans-Georg Gadamer's "The Beginning of Knowledge" is really a companion book to his "Truth and Method," which is a seminal work. "The Beginning of Knowledge" touches on such areas of investigating epistemology, ontology, teleology, history, and the social sciences. Hermeneutics first grew out of bible interpretation, interpreting law code, and the study of how humans communicate and use language, both in its verbal and written forms. Gadamer has taken hermeneutics to a whole new level, which touches on interpreting all communication, history, and the social sciences including the humanities. This book has caused me to "see" everything in a new philosophical light. When reading Gadamer, one instantly finds that he was influenced by Martin Heidegger, who he studied under, Hegel, and Aristotle. Hermeneutics is an interpretive methodology of a historically situated, linguistically mediated, contextualist and antifoundationalist theory of understanding. I know that is a mouthful, so the following will unpack this definition. The God Hermes is the source of the word "hermeneutics" Hermes the "messenger" was the go between the Gods and humans thus the word hermeneutics.

For Gadamer, interpretation is always connected with the "as," interpretation assumes that there are multiple ways or "lenses" with how we engage works. A different lens will produce a different way of seeing things. So, if our "as" is "cognitive knowledge" then we would approach a thing accordingly. If our "as" is "practical usefulness" then we approach it accordingly. For example, a botanist wants to understand what makes a tree a tree, a carpenter sees a tree as a source of lumber. Thus, hermeneutics is about the idea that there are many ways to interpret, which is why history is so important. It can also be present the world. Does historical inheritance allow for a blank slate? No, no divorce from what we are to be able approach a work in pure disinterestedness as Kant would have us do. No separate space in time. No pure present separated from the future. History doesn't tell us about the past, but about ourselves. Every present has sense of future, not just the past.

Gadamer's idea of interpretation, is to turn away from the idea of truth as a simple matter of fact, or certainty or a single principle. The idea of interpretation is that it is something that is "open." We use the word "interpret" that way when we say, "well how do you interpret that work"? This question means that there is not one way of reading the work. Unfortunately, though the difference between interpretation and fact is that a fact is not something open to interpretation, and therefore interpretation is seen as some kind of deficiency. It is seen as a lesser matter because it is open, and can't be secured by some kind of decisive result. A wide array of possibilities is what hermeneutics looks for; it is not just making it up. Hermeneutics does not mean one can't believe in objective truths; for example, there was a Civil War, it is a fact, what isn't a fact and has multiple truths and interpretations is what where the "causes" of the Civil War. Thus, hermeneutics for Gadamer doesn't mean that anything goes, it just means that there are multiple interpretations and possibilities when coming to terms with a text or artworks. The history of art is filled with different interpretations. There are multiple interpretations to many truths like in art.

There are already operating influences in how we regard anything. One of the ways to understand this is in child development. Every adult has been a child, and every child has been shaped by cultural influences through all sorts of ways, education, rearing, etc. So we sometimes forget about this because we are adults and no longer children, so we are on our own way so to speak. Every rearing of a child in terms of a certain set of historical influences or assumptions that the parents bring with them which they inherited from their parents and so on. In other words, any human self, will always be equipped with ways of seeing, and therefore there is no such thing as coming to see something as all by itself. However, as we'll also see, hermeneutic theory doesn't want to fall into the trap of saying "mere interpretation," because if it is mere interpretation it means there is something inadequate about it. If interpretation goes all the way down, then interpretation can't be deficient. It is simply a matter of getting clear what interpretations there are that shape us and being clearer about those. This doesn't mean that things can't change, it just means that whatever happens in human experience there is an already shaped factor to it. And because there is this already shaped factor that we did not produce ourselves, (since human child development has already been set), then it could be called mere interpretation in the sense that it is just an invention, an allusion, an appearance a relativism, that won't work either. Because, there is something about us being shaped by our culture that opens up our world for us, it is not just a matter of personal opinion.

Gadamer mentions history, thus the use of the historical artworld model is used by Gadamer, and brings in the notion of temporality, which means time. There obviously is a temporality in play, the game, the execution the time, the outcome. However, temporality for Gadamer is richer, a Heideggerian notion temporality is not just past present, and future, it is of fluid kind of circulation for people for selves who exist in time by experiencing these dimensions. It is impossible to live in the now. Because every sense of the present is formed by the past, if we didn't have a past there would be no shaping us to the point to the now, and every now is informed by the future. We have to live in the past and the future, everything we do is geared to the future. Past and future have a kind of openness to them. Heidegger's point is that idea of the abstractions of the past and the future as not now, and not yet now, or no longer now that very abstraction is created by an intellectual reflection that is not real. Therefore, any recollection is the present for the past. Thus, any anticipation is the present for the future, because you anticipate the future now, and you remember the past now. Thus, in a sense the past and the future are not abstractions that do not exist. There is a reality of the future and the past with anticipation and recollection. We all have various ways that the future is alive through anticipation and hope for example. The past is alive with things like nostalgia and regret. Temporality (time), is a circulation of these dimensions rather then three separate zones. Once that is done, the idea of history becomes a concrete temporality, history means what is the temporality of culture of people with actual means that occupy their lives, it is not just past, present, and future, its remembering the injustices of the past, to fix them in the future for example. Thus, history becomes an important temporality. It is filled with significance and meaningfulness rather than just the bare notions of the past. Because of Heidegger's open character of temporality in one sense the past is gone, but not totally gone, as we all know the past is something that can be revisited. The past is open to re-estimation; thus, structure of history is the same as temporality, it is open; thus, because of the open character it leads philosophers like Heidegger and Gadamer to say, that is why the idea of hermeneutics is interpretation and its model is open as well just like temporality. For instance, when we are trying to interpret and find meaning in something that is going on it is because we are presently trying to figure out what the hell happened in the past because of the future worries and consequences of what has happened. So we are inhabiting this circulation, and because the past is not like a objects that just stand there its open we can't really go back in time so we can only try to revision it, and the future is unknown and there is no way to be certain about what was said. It doesn't mean certain things can't be established, they can, but that doesn't end anything. No certainty however, the history of culture is therefore the history of temporal movement.

So, interpretation is not just simply opinion, interpretation refers to ways of seeing. Those ways of seeing are embedded in the world; they are not just subjective opinions. So, on the one hand we have the subject-object divide. The subjective is our opinions of the art, our impressions of it, neither one can hold in the hermeneutic theory, there can't be anything purely objective free of interpretation on the one hand, nothing can stand by itself, on the other hand it can't be merely subjective either, because we don't just make it up. This is the important point, we don't make it up. It shapes us. This hermeneutical way of "seeing" is analogous to a lens. A lens is something that lets us see in a certain way. A lens is only an analogy it isn't something that you could take off. A lens is a way of seeing that influences the way the thing appears, just as a lens does. However, a lens is nothing apart from what is being seen, so even though a lens is some kind of mere subjective concoction the lens is a way of seeing things. A lens is not a body of beliefs that is just simply in our heads, it is a way of seeing. However, according to the theory of interpretation, using the analogy, there is no "lens less seeing." Different cultures might have different lenses of a kind, or different periods in history might have different lenses. And here is one of the important ideas which needs to be stressed, art is something that has to do with ways of seeing. Therefore, art can affect our lenses. Art can be a lens that opens up something that we otherwise might not have seen.

What I like about Gadamer's notion is that in the modern period, the idea of the objective world was just scientific fact and so on, and the subjective world was ethics, art, and values, and so art is just how the human mind can see a thing. Gadamer talks allot about the phrase "Medial Structure," which is one way of trying to get over the subject/object divide, which is talked about in modern thought like the mind on one side of the fence and everything else on the other side. The idea of a medial structure is whatever is going on in experience or in the act of reading or responding is medially structured, that is to say that you can't pinpoint the source or the core of the truth on one side of the fence or the other of the work no object/subject divide.

Well one of the things about hermeneutics is it doesn't want to play that game of in the mind or in reality. The history of objectivity, what we mean by objectivity was a historical discovery, so, objectivity is a lens as well. Another words, the call to see the world objectively is another way of seeing or thinking and as you well know, objectivity is not usually the first thing that comes to mind, it has to be drilled in, coaxed, educated, disciplined. So, another words, to become objective is to discover another kind of lens.

I recommend this work for every thinking human; especially anyone interested in philosophy, epistemology, ontology, philosophy of art, art history, history, and the humanities. Get off the couch and read his book!!!

There is little info about this truely stunning book on this site however if you go to amazon.co.uk and serch it you will find out more. I also sell this book from amazon.co.uk (worldwide shipping avalible) and can get a personnal dedication from the author signed in your copy!

But to give you more info here is the text from the back cover of the book, the publisher's note, inside flap and author bio.

Book Description
The discovery of the most terrifyingly beautiful natural phenomenon ever to confront the eyes of man...
* The 12 signs of the zodiac (including a near 50 mile tall crucified Christ in Cumbria) miraculously profiled in the coastlines of Britain and N. Ireland - a picture of heaven on earth

* Equally remarkable, these figures are enormous mirror images of those found some 70 years ago mysteriously landscaped in a 10 mile diameter circle in Glastonbury, Devon. That same 10-mile circle, now precisely delineating the starry eye of the 155-mile long Piscean fish!

*Speaking of eyes, many place names actually verify the wonder underfoot - the eye of Sagittarius being beneath the Suffolk town of Eye! Seems then we may not be the first to know of this enchanted floor plan....

Was the reason behind the boy Jesus' supposed visit to Britain to experience himself already crucified on a cross 300 miles tall? To follow his recorded footsteps through Pisces will be to tempt a 'yes'!

Was Jason's search for the Golden Fleece carried out on these starry shores? Certainly, such is mapped out amidst the fleece of Yorkshire's constellation of Aries.

Was the Arthurian quest for the Holy Grail purposefully played out around this landscaped map of the heavens? When I take you to Cumbria's great green Christ you will see that very cup, 672ft high, and named for what it is, poignantly placed at his side wound in stunning testament to the legend.

Where the Egyptians aware of Britain's miracle when they pinpointed the Fields of the Blessed/ Underworld over the western Horizon? For sure, we'll find both word and picture of their lord of the Underworld, Osiris, inscribed all over these western fields.

Indeed, it will seem that the mythology of many cultures has been stored in these revelatory fields, especially when the extraordinary graphic clues in the map suggest that Noah's ark (the flood being a near global myth) was, or WILL BE, these British Isles.

But this is just the tip of the Iceberg

*To journey through these topographical constellations, registering as we go the startling evidence on the ground, will be to decode a 300x300 mile pictogram to the conclusion that the very Earth herself is desperately trying to speak to us - trying, via the universal language of mythology, to warn us that all creation stands at this moment upon a monumental brink. One of either pending catastrophe or, if we have the perception, one over which we can make a evolutionary leap, hand in hand which nature, into a new golden age - a new global spanning Jerusalem - a heaven on Earth, hence Britain's Prophetic shape!

The odyssey awaiting the open-minded reader is like no other. Perchance a few will return with lives of uplifted and a love for this planet bordering on the painful. ...If not a fluke, staggering will the implications be.

From the Publisher
In this book author Graham Griffiths presents a staggering portfolio of the evidence that will fundamentally change the reader's conception of mythology and nature. In his work Griffiths demonstrates how the British Isles are powerfully marked by the 12 zodiacal constellations, constellations etched in the landscape, evidenced in place names, and local mythology and visually documented through a series of beautiful illustrations by the author. Furthermore Griffiths demonstrates through the use of legends and myths from all countries and religions how the landscape of Britain, of the planet is sending to us a vital message about our own moral existence. This limited edition book is a treasure for generations, and might just prove to be a poignant marker for those who we leave this Earth to.

The book is a limited edition of only 1000 copies, all hand signed by the author himself. It features multiple full page illustartions by the author himself and is beautifully bound and presented.

From the Inside Flap
He was eleven years old when he first spotted four giants profiled in the coastal shape of Britain. He thought nothing of it at the time. Seventeen years later he stumbled upon a book containing silhouetted replicas of his four childhood giants. However, these were but four in a circle of twelve zodiacal figures as found in the 1930s by Katherine Maltwood and seemingly sculpted via the uncanny artistry of steams, ancient track ways and contours in the vicinity of Glastonbury, Devon. The enigmatic ten-mile circle those figures form since became known as the Glastonbury Zodiac. Until then Graham hadn't even realised his own giants were astrological.
Using Maltwood's giants as templates, at the age of 42 he had found virtual duplicates of those remaining eight Glastonbury figures fitting exactly the rest of Britain and N. Ireland's coastline. A further ten years on and what you now hold in your hands is geological, historical, mythological, religious - you name it - it's dynamite!
But Graham is a reluctant author; feels out of his depth, indeed feels shanghaied into having to tell this tale - shanghaied, because his conscience insisted it could be too important not to tell. The result is that his down-to-earth passion and, at time raging self-doubt, leaps off the page. In truth, he hardly dares himself to believe in what he has discovered - because surely it's all too beautiful to be true? The implications too damned earth shaking to be taken seriously? Thus, he merely asks is to look with new eyes at the disarming evidence on the ground, thereafter to make of it what we will. As for Graham, his task, indeed what has become his unplanned life's work, is done. He can now return to his paintbrushes, for like Maltwood, he too is an artist. It seems artists have an eye for that which others have been blind to.

About the Author
Graham K Griffiths is an internationally published graphic designer/ illustrator. In 1991 he had the honour of having President George Bush senior request that a piece of his work should hang in the library of the white house. That work is now part of the White House permanent collection. His previous title includes The Witch of Bickley Mill, a children's book which he wrote and illustrated. Triggered by his writing Behold Jerusalem, however, Griffith is choosing more and more often to abandon his desk-bound studio life and to brave the elements of the Dartmoor National Park, Devon painting form dusk till dawn and sometimes long after the moon has risen and the frost is glittering, in effort to convey his new found love affair with the land. His new work, unlike anything he has previously done, has already gained him several one-man exhibitions and in 2002 he was selected as a principal artist in the definitive book Dartmoor Artists by Brain Le Messurier (Halsgrove), and thus himself rubbing shoulders with the likes of J.M.W Turner. Griffiths lives on Pisces with his wife and two daughters.

Benardete's translation is very literal. His commentaries on each of the dialogues is insightful and his introduction that is a commentary on the major hippias is incredibly helpful.

Belief and Knowledge presents a new and fresh outlook on epistemology and cognitive science. In this informative, thought-provoking scholarly work that has evolved over 12 years, Professor Kenneth Sayre challenges traditional views on knowledge and cognition. Written in an elegant style, the book is easy to read and a treasure for those hungry for something new in the field of epistemology. With Knowledge Management sweeping all quarters of our knowledge-based world, Belief and Knowledge is certainly a knowledge enabler: a must-read for any serious researcher and student. It now occupies a prominent place in my personal library.

This is an excellent and very informative account of Berkeley's theory of vision - a topic that deserves to be studied on its own and not only (as has often been the case) as a minor side of his subjective idealism. Atherton's book is a must for all students of Berkeley and highly recommendable to those who are interested in the philosophical aspects of the theory of vision or in the development of epistemology in early modern philosophy.

The Berlin Haskalah And German Religious Thought is a seminal work of impressive and original scholarship offering a new and fascinating perspective on the Haskalah that will be of immense interest to scholars and students of Judaic studies, Germany history, and the evolution of western religion in an increasingly science oriented and secular Europe.

This book gives the best knowledge of the History of beverages in required amounts, Not too much,not too less. This book has all the required material for any person who has interest in beverages and their management. By far the best beverage book.

I have read many Education texts but non-as compelling, gripping or insightful as this. Coulby uses a down to earth approachable format and style to convey complex ideas to the reader.
An absolute must for all those in this profession and a highly advisory text for those wanting to broaden their knowledge and views of education.
My tutor recommended this to me and I would recommend this to anyone highly!
Very international though perhaps not quite as positive about the States as one might hope!
A challenging but rewarding read with a unique and intelligent perception.

This book considers the inspirational effect of the Bible on Western Literature and Art. It is based on work done for "The Encyclopedia Judaica" Dr. Sivan who was a major contributor to Judaica covers a very wide area in showing how central the Bible is to so much of the creative heart of Western Civilization.
The reading of this work gave me much knowledge and enjoyment.