Outstanding
More Pages: Outstanding Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108

List price: $12.95 (that's 20% off!)
Used price: $8.95
Buy one from zShops for: $9.19

Solid, but not as current or comprehensive as one would like
List price: $24.95 (that's 30% off!)
Used price: $17.09
Buy one from zShops for: $16.44

This book has nothing the other Taunton books have1. Most of the projects in the book are for the very experienced craftsman. The projects seemed complicated just to be complicated. I'm not saying they should be super simple either but I think Taunton missed the mark on these.
2. These projects are for the woodworker who has a full set of power tools in their workshop. I also purchased Tauton's "Tables" book and loved the fact that many of the projects where done with minimal power tools. In this book the concept of "hand cut dovetails" are dovetails done with a jigsaw and a router. Way too many expensive jigs, routers, biscuits and pocket joints.
Since my next project is a chest of drawers for my son, I was really hoping to find inspiration in this book based on my other purchases of Taunton's books. Unfortunately I found none in this book. The ultimate test for me is to show my wife projects from books to see which one(s) she likes. She also found nothing in this book that we would want to build. Hopefully further book's released by Taunton can avoid these mistakes and make a book which most woodworkers can enjoy.
Disappointing compared to the rest of the series1. Intentional difficulty-It almost seems as though the author tried to come up with the most complex solution to any joinery problem. For example, is there not an easier way to do the joinery for the Contemporary Chest (a beautiful piece, by the way) besides making 180 loose tenons and 8 dozen mortises? The triple dresser is gorgeous but I am not sure that could be made to the same quality outside of the Thomasville factory.
2. Lack of variety-I am sure that many of these projects can be modified but if I wanted to substantially modify them, I would just design something myself (something I don't feel comfortable doing yet on a project of this magnitude) and wouldn't need the book. The Pennsylvania Dutch chest, though nice (I mean, I am Pennsylvania Dutch) probably isn't something that needs to take up space in a book called Chests of Drawers. Something in the Arts and Crafts style would have been nice as well as a true Shaker project. Beyond that, one or two variations of a simple, but well constructed chest would have been helpful.
I was disappointed in this book and cannot recommend it. I probably would have given it one star, but most of the projects are truly beautiful. I am sure someone can make 'em!
Excellent instruction with adaptable plans'Chests of Drawers' is one of a series of 'Projects from America's Best Craftsmen' by Taunton Press. It includes seven projects, which doesn't sound like much, but in those seven projects, Hylton succeeds in getting across the basics of a variety of chest constructions, including bowfronts, triple dressers, blanket chests, tall chests, a Queen Anne chest on cabriole legs, and sheet-goods casework. It would be easy to take any of the seven projects presented, and adapt their construction to a wide variety of chests of drawers.
The discussions of built-up moldings and how they are made is a lesson in woodworking in general. These ideas would be usable on other types of furniture pieces, as would the instruction in bent laminations, string inlay and shop-made pulls. Hylton is an authority with the router, and in this book he gives many hints and tips on using it to complete drawer construction, mortises, base moldings, and dovetails.
Not all the projects are centered around expensive solid hardwoods. One double dresser, which could be adapted to a single chest, uses veneered sheet goods with biscuits, pocket-hole joinery and commercial drawer runners to keep down the cost, but you wouldn't know it to look at it. Simple, clean lines in an understated style lend it a spare elegance akin to Shaker furniture.
At the opposite end of the scale is the Qeen Anne chest on stand, with dovetailed case sides, dovetailed drawers resting on web frame infrastructure, and molding attached with sliding dovetails cut to allow for wood movement. The stand is an ogee profile, spline-mitered frame with pinnned tenons attaching rails to the bandsawn legs. When I'm ready to attempt that project, I'll be glad Bill Hylton is within reach. His step by step guidance through the complicated procedures is easily understandable, and well illustrated with clear color photos.
Of the many, many books I am offered to review, this one is definitely a 'keeper.' It is clear enough in its procedures to encourage a beginning woodworker, and has enough advanced pieces in it to serve as a skill-building exercise for the more experienced woodworker. I give it five stars. Written for the serious woodworker wanting to improve his or her skills, this book deserves every one of them.

Used price: $0.93
Collectible price: $2.97
Buy one from zShops for: $2.75

The Epitome of Depressing Eighties "Writing"
real short stories
Great book for secondary Engligh teachers!
Used price: $34.95

too little time on the most important stuff.......
Used price: $32.00
Buy one from zShops for: $52.50

Too few tapes for such a long subject
Used price: $24.94
Collectible price: $29.00
Buy one from zShops for: $29.99

Should have been longer!
Used price: $1.90
Buy one from zShops for: $0.55

How did this get published? Yuk
Collectible price: $13.50

25 outstanding decks you can build
List price: $24.95 (that's 30% off!)
Buy one from zShops for: $65.95

Don't know what the others thought

Analysis of the tendency to preserve contrasts at edgesThe author provides an Optimality Theoretic (OT) analysis of this tendency by via the faithfulness family of constraints. Essentially, constraints that require faithfulness are more ardently enforced at edges of phonological phrases, roots, words, or syllables.
Trubetzkoy and Steriade attribute the phenomenon to the observation that phonetic contrasts are more salient in onset position than in a complex coda. Aside from encoding this observation in OT, I don't see that this thesis contributes much to our understanding of the phenomenon.
The fact that morphological edges emerge as "special" in some languages raises an interesting question as to what edges are most important. For example, the author discusses at length the fact that in the Bantu language Shona, more contrasts are found in the first stem vowel (position) than in subsequent vowels. The author attributes this to positional faithfulness-i.e., the height of the first stem vowel is more faithfully maintained than subsequent vowels. As this is a case of a morphological edge (verb stems in Shona, like all Bantu languages, are proceeded by subject and tense prefixes in all but a few contexts, such as commands), one might be tempted to say that Stem Faithfulness outranks word faithfulness. Unfortunately, in other Bantu languages, high vowel suffixes alter the height of stem vowels. Thus, in KiKuria, the agentive suffix [i] raises the stem vowel. We can only conclude that in KiKuria, Stem Faithfulness is outranked by other faithfulness constraints (specifically, those that determine that suffix vowel height).
Romance provides another example; word final vowels (other than [a]) in Portuguese are raised to high. One could attribute this to the relative low ranking of faithfulness for word final vowels in Portuguese. In other Romance languages, including many dialects of Italian, high vowel suffixes alter the quality of stem vowels (even if the suffix is word final). In these languages, then, it appears that faithfulness for word-final vowels is highly ranked.
These questions beg the question as to what generalizations can be made of positional faithfulness. Should we expect one type of faithfulness constraint to be highly ranked throughout a family (contra the examples cited above), or can any language rank all types of positional faithfulness freely (as the above examples suggest)? If the answer is more like the latter, I wonder, what has this thesis contributed to the discussion? If the answer is more like the latter, I wonder, what has this thesis contributed to the discussion?