Goes

This book reminded me of a collage term paper being done at the last minute when you increase the font size and margins to try and stretch the meager text to the length requirement. I have never been a big fan of his interview show, but I was hoping given the amount of time he has been at it, he would have some interesting "during the break" type of stories from his guests. It turned out that this was not the case.

I would like to say that I enjoyed this book or at least found parts interesting or well written, but that would not be honest. I had to keep reading given it was the only book I had on a 9 hour flight. How can someone that has interviewed so many interesting and influential people over the years have this little to say? Thank goodness for the professional writer he hired or who knows if we would have even had complete sentences to read. Overall the book was dull, no insights and barely anything interesting.

Larry King is usually the background noise during dinner time in my (single) household so I pretend that I know him rather well. So when I started the book I expected the wise and experienced uncle to provide some wisdom and tell me about invaluable experiences. Well, it did not live up to that, especially in the first half of the book. But every now and again - moreso towards the end - I could hear him saying what he was writing. Much in the beginning just does not sound like him.

The books offers a great overview of what moved the media during the 90ies: so, here is your entertaining history lesson - not entirely comprehensive but certainly the basics for the media small talk. He does not show off, he is honest with himself and he displays the very down-to-earth side of himself. Maybe it just lacks more wicked, unheard-of experiences that I expected to get a better rating. You got to have this "wise uncle at 9 PM EST" with him to like the book.

Well never having read a larry King book considering he wrote so many this book was great. It gave you inside edge on what larry king has seen, heard, and talked about in the years of his careers. It's was great reading about all the people he talk too. I would definely recommand this book to a friend.

My so called life goes on is a very entertaining book but at times I felt a loss between the characters now and the characters that I fell in love with in the series. Chaterine Clark did not capture the essence of Angela which was most disappointing but there were other things in the book that did not add up either. Like Jordan never called Brian by his real name always by brain and Jordan would never beg anyone to help him... unless it was Angela and about sex!!! Also the route that the characters took were a total 90 degree switch from the series. I mean I was a fan of the show when it first aired back in 94 and I have recently watched the whole series on dvd and when I watched the characters on screen it was almost as if I had found a peice of my heart that had been missing for quite awhile. I think it was more about how Winnie Holzman created the characters and they were so relatable and the things in there series were so real that it was easy to watch and not feel apart from yourself but it was like you could become apart of the show. I enjoyed the book emensly and I know that the book was not like the show because it did not come the heart of the writers but I really did enjoy it and if you have an open mind and just enjoy reading about the characters you will to. BTW the ending was such an unexpecting thing but I have to say that I did enjoy the ending!!!

I think Catherine Clark did a good job creating a summer for the MSCL characters, and I actually found what she came up with pretty believable. After all, I think it makes perfect sense that Angela would work at her dad's restaurant, Rayanne would not be able to hold down one steady job, and Sharon would STILL sleep with Kyle, even after promising herself she wouldn't. Okay, so what happens with Brian is a little out there (I won't give it away!) but come on, the poor guy deserves some adventure. All in all, I enjoyed this continuation for the MSCL crew.

I'm still uncertain as to why most reviews have been negative about this book.

This book doesn't hold a candle to the series, true. But it's like comparing the metaphorical apples and oranges. The show had brilliant performances,as well as lighting, sound and other visual aspects to bring its story to life. The book has only text; but I think Clark has done a commendable job of envisioning the series through just text.

All of the main characters and many of the supporting characters have moments that fit in nicely with the overall summer story, particularly Brian Krakow. (And let me tell you: If you were heartbroken with the final episode of the series, read the book and see Brian finally get a bone tossed his way.) Everyone gets a piece of the pie, but what's nice is that we get to hear their own individual voice as well. The tv show took an overwhelmingly subjective viewpoint from Angela, while this books delves into all of the kids' minds. Unfortunately the one downfall of the book is that there's not much attention on Patty or Graham, so those looking to see the Chase parental units at work will be starved. But that's ok, because this is about the kids' summer.

I'm also at a loss as to how anyone can compare this with the first book Catherine Clark wrote about the MSCL characters, as the first book is essentially a novelization of the series. hmmm...

But anwyay, if you were angered and unsatisfied at the abrupt end of the show, then I recommend reading the book to provide a more adequate closure. (And if you really, really, REALLY want to see Brian Krakow shine!) :)

This book contains little perspective on Wellstone himself, a figure whom it is easy to love or hate.

It's mainly useful for recording certain facts surrounding the 1990 election and for a largely positive spin -- in a superficial and biased view -- of Paul Wellstone.

This book is interesting and worthwhile in two ways: first, because it does press Paul Wellstone's [fabulous] politics, and second, because it is a well written documentary of a fascinating campaign. Anyone interested in progressive politics or innovative campaigning is advised to read.

This is an excellent book that portrays what a politician should be. Plain and simple, if you like real politics, READ THIS BOOK!

The most unbelievable thing about this novel is the dialog. People just don't talk like that to each other. Painful to read.

It's a great book that will hold you until the end of the book. The book has that warm southern feel to it, yet it will keep you on the edge to read more about the adventures of Hillary and Jane as they always seem to end up in the wrong place at the wrong time. Overall, a great book worth reading on a long winter day.

This is the first of this series that I've read. It won't be the last. I truly enjoyed this cozy series. The two main characters are Hillary and Jane. Hillary is a Southern Belle who is rich. She is a decorator but cooks too. Jane is a single mom who can't cook or decorate but works for Hillary. They are fun together and get into all sorts of messes.

In this book they go to the south of France so Hillary cn attend a prestigious cooking school. Hillary wants to rent a house that is expensive (even for her) so she gets other people from their Alabama town to go to France with her. Of course there are murders and Hillary and Jane are in the thick of things but end up solving the murders.

I actually wondered about the people who ended up being involved. I didn't solve it exactly but was on the right track. I can't wait to read the other books in this series: Deathday Party and Leading an Elegant Death.

I was very disappointed with this book. The ideas were not new and the coverage was very superficial. This could be forgiven if there wasn't such a clear bias in the book. There were shades of bias in the early chapters, but as the book moved into the more modern elections it became clear that Shogan has a serious axe to grind. His coverage of the 2000 election is particularly skewed. His disdain for President Bush is quite evident. An example of this disdain can be found in his summary of the 2000 election from page 243: "Here was the governor of Texas, possessed of slim credentials, a nondescript intellect, and an underwhelming persona running a nose ahead of the incumbent vice president of an administration that had presided over a time of unparalleled prosperity. What's wrong with this picture?"

IÕm a bit of a political junky, but an unusual one in that I get almost all my news from print. Before I was old enough to vote I realized that television news didnÕt have much to tell me, and I stopped watching. Except for election results, and an occasional breaking story, I havenÕt watched television news since Nixon was president. Still, I realize that itÕs where most Americans get their news, and so IÕm curious about how it covers candidates and how (or if) it shapes opinions. ThatÕs why I picked up this book Ð a survey of how the media (especially television) have covered presidential elections since 1968.

I was very disappointed. I rarely pay attention to t.v. coverage, but even I knew almost everything in here. Robert Shogan has been covering presidential elections since 1948. I expected some professional insight, a few peeks behind the scenes, at least some thought-provoking opinions. Forget it. This is a bland recitation of everything you already know -- the press doesnÕt understand much about the making of a president, the press is more interested in the horse race than the issues, charismatic candidates do better than substantive ones on t.v., politicians avoid talking about issues and the press lets them get away with it. Is there anyone with even a mild interest in politics who doesnÕt know this already?

The lack of insight is especially frustrating in ShoganÕs coverage of the 2000 election, which the media tripped all over itself trying to cover. Surely all the mistakes the media made in reporting on the election and its aftermath offers plenty of material for analyzing exactly how the media messes up when it tries to cover elections. But no. Shogan tells us the press adored McCain Ð which was pretty obvious Ð but doesnÕt offer an opinion about why. McCain was an underdog, but the press isnÕt always kind to underdogs Ð they certainly werenÕt kind to Bradley, Buchanan, or Nader. Shogan argues that the press went a lot easier on Bush than Gore, even though the majority of reporters probably voted Democratic. But once again, he offers no explanation of this paradox.

I think this book deals with an important topic. It just doesnÕt cover it very well. Shogan accuses the press of dealing superficially with presidential elections. But in the end I think this book is guilty of the same superficiality.

A former Los Angeles Times political reporter, Shogan offers an inside account of the nature of the press-presidency relationship in the modern era. Joining an ever-lengthening list of critical accounts of the media by current and former members of the Fourth Estate, Shogan's book is a good read, full of telling anecdotes and insightful observations. His account focuses on the media treatment of presidents and presidential campaigns from the late 1960s to the present--appropriate enough given the transformation of the national media in the wake of the Vietnam War and the Watergate scandal. Shogan is certainly not alone in emphasizing that the modern media have overreached in treating public figures with disdain. Most media scholars and journalists will agree with Shogan's assessments of where press coverage has gone wrong in the past three decades. Shogan's book is clearly written and sensibly argued. Scholars may find it frustrating in some regards, for example, the lack of references to many of the leading works in the field and the use of dated earlier editions of some studies rather than more recent material; accordingly it will be most useful in general and undergraduate collections.

The topic is quite interesting and relevant considering our current situation. The early part of the book is the most gripping, but I have to say that the chapters dealing with the 20th Century were a big let down. Volkman is correct in saying only a couple of people left the Manhatten project, but he does not mention that many scientists refused to work on the project. The data is skewed to represent the thesis of author, but it would have been nice to read about some of the counter arguments, such as the early peace movement among scientists in the 16th Century. It would have been notable if more effort could have been made towards some of the scientist peace movement successes (such as the ban on some areas of biological research during the 1970s). There are however, lots of little nuggets of information that keep the readers' interest until the end. Inside this book, there is a great one waiting to come out. Perhaps in a later edition.....

Volkman seemed to go in circles when making his point. It seemed very repetitive, at times, like a 5th grader writing his first report and trying to fill up space.

For those looking for an indepth analysis of the history of science and warfare, you will be very disappointed. However, if you are just curious of how science has influenced our world, you will find this an easy book to read and understand.

I know my review kind of swings both ways. But to me, the book's writing swings back and forth between good and bad. I'm pleased with the content but not so pleased with the author's writing ability.

This was however, the most informative and easy to read book on the subject I've seen yet.

Absolutely one of the best, most accurate, well-documented, and organized books on the subject of science being "the bringer of evil; the bringer of life." It isn't lite reading, but the knowledge gained from its pages will affect the way you think about the risks and benefits of technology forever. Be strong, be brave, be afraid.

This book is aweful, bottom line. The techniques shown are not practical and very dangerous for people to try. I don't have the courage to try these techniques. if you ever try these moves, be sure to reserve a hospital bed in advance.

Most of the book is too difficult to follow because the drawings are confusing and don't really show anything. I question the credibility of anyone who feels it necessary to curse on the back cover.

Anybody who has ever had any real hand to hand training will have a good laugh at this book.

Cheap Shots, Ambushes, etc was better. Some right-on advice and a few nasty ideas/moves. Worth buying, but don't expect too much...he basically says being on the floor is bad, so don't do it, and get up really quick if you go down.

Fighting on the Floor is a very difficult thing. Everyone who does a martial art covering that topic knows that. But when a "real" fight goes to the ground, everything's much more difficult. So in this book, MacYoung describes ways to keep the damage on your side as low as possible, and getting the damage on the opponent's side as high as possible. And like all the other books from this author, it's the neat little tricks that make this topic interesting.

Terrible!!! Are you willing to go on a liquid diet for 2 weeks that consists of some expensive mixture from a health food store and the water from steamed veggies??? If you are, then you are as crazy as I was to buy this stupid book. Plus, you spend one day that you cannot leave home due to the laxatives you must take. He says it is a permanent weight loss, but you must be very careful to eat a very well-balanced diet afterwards. Same song, second verse. This diet even sounds dangerous. Don't waste your money!!

I read Alma goes on the Turbo Diet & The Turbo-Protien Diet. They were a very fast read and similar. Alma goes on the Turbo Diet was very simple in its approach while The Turbo-Protien Diet was more technical.

I have tried many, many diets. I started this program last Sunday at 153pds. I am 5'7". I feel most comfortable at 130pds. As of today, I am at 145.5 (7.5pds lighter). I have a lot of energy.

HOWEVER, this is NOT a diet for anyone that has never drank protein shakes. Before the diet, I had 1 a day and a protein bar. The mixture from this diet tastes much worse than a regular protein shake. I am now very comfortable with the taste. The first day was the worse--determining amounts of powder to water.

I am really happy and will be on it for 7 more days. I work out 30-40 minutes a day normally and still have the energy to do so.
Good luck.

Story and graphics were poor. This is just a bunch of screen shots from the curious george movies, and has no real story line. Any of the books that are derived from the movies seem to have similar problems.

MY CHILD WAS ASK TO READ THIS BOOK FOR HER CLASS AND TELL HOW SHE ENJOYED THE BOOK AS WELL AS THE ILLUSTRATIONS. THE CLASS WAS DELIGHTED AND SO WAS HER TEACHER. NOW HER TEACHER HAS ASKED ALL THE STUDENTS TO PICK A CURIOUS GEORGE BOOK TO PRESENT TO THE CLASS BECUASE IT WAS EASY TO READ, FULL OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND IT KEEP THEIR ATTENTION.

My 5 and 3 year olds didn't seem to be too troubled by this book, but I found it dark and disturbing. What starts out as a seemingly typical children's story takes a sudden and scary turn. I have to think that the only reason they weren't more scared is that they are too young to know anything about World War II and the death camps. But even without that metaphor, the illustrations are disturbing in themselves. Skulls, razor wire, dark figures... it's just not what I consider appropriate for a children's book. The "magic pencil" story could easily have been told with less threatening villians and more age-appropriate illustrations. I found myself searching the book's dust jacket for why on earth the author would choose to create a book like this for young children.

Funny, my son and I liked it. Bear goes to town with a magic pencil, makes friends with Cat, saves cat and a variety of other animals from a guarded camp (Animal Control? funny place to find cows, though), and draws an idyllic hillside for these animals to occupy. The illustrations are quirky and unexpected, while the tone of the book is calm, almost somnabulistic. It does seem to have an underlying theme about harm to animals, but it is deeply placed, and my child was much more concerned with the clear "good and evil" parameters he's familiar with from fairy tales.

I got this when my son was about 4 yrs. old. He is now using it in a creative writing class in High school. Its his favorite book. We thought it was funny. I think because it is very different and unusual people cant seem to see the humor, nor the creativity side of it.