Free-riding Books

Used price: $7.19

Attention Chrome CowgirlsReview Date: 2007-02-16
Awesome women abound... fantastic read.Review Date: 2007-05-07
A Must-Read for Aspiring Road-DivasReview Date: 2004-09-15
The real stories of women and their rides will inspire anyone to get out there and ride -- no matter your background :) From historical women who pioneered the road (before the roads were ANYTHING like we know) to today's high speed racers. Pictures in the book add to the story, they don't detract.
The book is so awesome, my husband reads it :)
And you thought only men road motorcycles!!Review Date: 2003-11-28

Used price: $3.43

Practical Snow Analysis Examples and infoReview Date: 2004-01-28
Info is straight forward, has practice examples to test your knowledge on when to ride and when to walk away from certain conditions, lots of pics to help explain terrain features and in depth "how to's" on testing snow strength, as well as detailed instructions on correct probing technique.
Added bonus: Craig Kelly helped contribute to the info in this book, and hence there are many pictures of him throughout. Much love to our fallen hero.
Worth $8.00? Oh heck yeah. Small price to pay to save the life of your friends and your own.
Freeriding in Avalanche TerrainReview Date: 2000-07-13


Excellent book!!Review Date: 2004-01-26
An excellent text for learning free lungeingReview Date: 1999-03-27

Used price: $19.04

A great, hard to find resource for western saddle fitReview Date: 2008-07-01

Used price: $17.99

Top BookReview Date: 2008-10-12
This book is not just a book to read, it is a tool to be used and applied. It should be in every horse owner's library. A great sized book, with glossy pages, you will not be disappointed in the slightest.
Excellent basis for English saddle fitReview Date: 2008-07-01
great help with saddle and horse selectionReview Date: 2008-01-14
Ten out of TenReview Date: 2008-10-26
BUST the saddle fit myths!Review Date: 2008-07-06

First few chaptersReview Date: 2008-09-04
I have to say, I would be a little freaked out if I
had to go to some strangers house like Sam did. Even
if she was an old lady.
I like it alot, so far, I like them all.
Phantom Stallion #5Review Date: 2008-01-13
Faith of a FillyReview Date: 2005-10-12
Phantom Stallion is a Great Series!!Review Date: 2005-03-04
Wonderful Addition to the Horse Fiction GenreReview Date: 2004-09-02
This is my first ever PHANTOM STALLION book, and I am not in anyway disappointed. I found the character of Sam to be full of wonderful spirit, determination, and intelligence. Her outlook on life, and her love for animals (especially horses), is absolutely wonderful, and her courageousness in searching for the blind little filly in the middle of a snowstorm was utterly remarkable. The supporting characters, such as Sam's friends, Jen and Jake, and her guardians, her Father and her Grandmother, make the story so much better, and keep it flowing well, while at the same time capturing the readers' attention. Overall this was a wonderful book that will be cherished for years to come by horse lovers.
Erika Sorocco
Book Review Columnist for The Community Bugle Newspaper

Used price: $14.99

At last a back doctor who doesn't tell me to give up riding!!Review Date: 2007-11-21
Better than expectedReview Date: 2007-11-19
I recommend this book to every rider, not just those with back problems, since it provides a lot of information on the aging rider's back, and none of us can turn back the clock! Prevention is worth a ton of cure.
Good book!Review Date: 2007-07-23
Happy reading,
Kathy
Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $25.86

I'm ready to dismount!Review Date: 2000-08-13
This book will really get you thinking...Review Date: 1998-11-10
Explains why privatization is better than government controlReview Date: 1997-04-17

Used price: $27.95

Good philosophy, little applicabilityReview Date: 2008-11-03
First, Tuck distinguishes the case that Olson is looking at from two others. One is the infamous Prisoners dilemma. This represents a different, and much easier problem, because in the Prisoner's dilemma each player has a clear effect on the outcome. Thus, mechanisms can be designed to discipline people, and tit for tat strategies in repeated settings may insure compliance. The Olson case is harder, because, argues Tuck, if no-one has a perceptible influence on the outcome, there is no reason to punish anyone!
A second case that is different from Olson is when there is a clear threshold, such as in voting. In voting, the good (a certain candidate elected) is provided if the majority votes for her. In this case it is a mistake, according to Tuck, to say that people are not responsible for the outcome if the difference is more than one vote. In fact, everybody who helped to reach the threshold, and was thus in the critical set of votes may be said to be responsible for the outcome. As long as the probability that you are in that critical set of votes is high enough, it is rational to vote. There are some subtleties here, for example, this definition of rationality cannot rely on a counterfactual view of causality, because if one would not have voted the result of the election would have been the same. But, says Tuck, this does not mean that your vote does not cause the candidate to be elected, and therefore does not imply that it is irrational to vote.
This latter case provides the germ to a solution to the true Olsonian case. Tuck's move is to say that a true Olsonian case can also be perceived as having a threshold. He does so by looking at the history of thought the Sorites paradox (If we keep adding grains to a pile, can we pinpoint the moment when we call it a heap?). From this emerges a thoughtful, but slightly complicated argument that I will not summarize. Tuck concludes that there is no perfectly satisfactory solution to this paradox, but that we nevertheless have a rough and functional idea when something is a heap. Analogously, we roughly know in a public social dilemma how much cooperation is `enough'. Thus, if enough other people contribute, and we are likely to be in the critical set to reach this fuzzy `enough'-threshold, it will be rational to contribute.
The second part of the book discusses the history of thought on social dilemma's and particularly Olson's problem. Tuck shows that it was not until the 1930's that people started to think about the problem of negligible contributions (in the context of perfect competition in economics). The associated idea that cooperation is not rational is therefore rather recent. Philosophers such as Hume and Mill assumed that cooperation was rational, but that shortsightedness prohibited people sometimes from pursuing their self-interest.
Tuck is a specialist on social dilemmas with many interesting insights. The philosophical point about rationality is original, clever and undoubtedly important in some debates. However, I do not find it as interesting as the back-flap quotes that applaud it do. First, strictly speaking (something on which Tuck insists), truly Olsonian situations seem to be rare. Second, Tuck basically points out an ambiguity in the meaning of rationality (is it necessarily based on counterfactual causal reasoning?), and shows that in an expanded meaning it can account for contributions in the Olson case. This is ultimately a matter of definition which does not really further the understanding of compliance.
For example, his argument does not give a convincing account of why people behave differently. Some people walk on the grass, others don't. Is that because they employ different conceptions of what is valid causal reasoning? I believe that people have intrinsic reasons to cooperate, that have to do with their identity (who am I?), with their desire to be part of some groups and not others and yes, with sanctions (which can be very rational if they are aimed at all free-riders at the same time). Stating these motives in terms of preferences can also incorporate contributions in a rational framework. Tuck makes little of such arguments, because he says that they do not really explain the why of contribution. This is true in some sense, but for many purposes such explanations do fine, and at least they can account for heterogeneity in behavior, which Tuck's reductionism can't.
Actually, the part that I liked the most was the summary of the diverse philosophical arguments surrounding social dilemmas. This part is well-researched, and contains instructive quotes. In short, an intelligent book that is worth reading. It furthers philosophical discussions by questioning our standard conception of rationality, but I doubt that it will help us much to understand actual free riding behavior.

Used price: $4.39

Laugh out loud at timesReview Date: 2008-10-09
Lighten up and enjoy the reading !!!
Notorcycle MythsReview Date: 2008-06-16
It is a nice book for reading the urban motorcycle myths from first hand, I enjoyed reading it very much.
One damn good read!Review Date: 2008-02-04
Ridin' High, Livin' Free: Hell-Raising Motorcycle StoriesReview Date: 2007-07-19
Stories from the road. Review Date: 2006-12-31