Fourth-market Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62

The Kent State Shootings: A lambast against "the establishment"Review Date: 2008-12-29


The Traveller - Doesn't travel enoughReview Date: 2009-01-04
Overall the book took a slow pace, and I found the author a bit wordy. That said, I liked the premise of the story.
The backstory as to who and why and where it starts fills kind of rolled in though and not well explained. Perhaps a cheap pawn off excuse for the rest of the story.
The dialogue feels stilted and the flow is a bit rough around the edges.
Good points -
Characters grow and change during the story.
Some really likeable characters.
Good descriptive detail where important.
Open viewpoint on religion - bonus points for that.
This is my first novel by him that I've read. I'm going to buy the 2nd book in the trilogy. Expecting the writing to only get better.
A World Gone Cheney. Satisfying page turner!Review Date: 2008-12-23
The book does deserve some attention. It's a fun story, and it speculates on a world not so different from that of Bush and Cheney. Tools of the the War on Terror feature heavily in the novel, and evil emanates from those who distrust that which they cannot control. With the War on Terror with us for many years to come, such fiction is not only interesting, it is important.
As other reviewers have suggested, the characters are flat. The author has a lot to learn about writing--the novel lags at times, and the reader can easily drift in and out of the novel's draw. But, for the most part, I eagerly returned to the book, hungry for more looks into a world so very like our own.
Three Hawks short of a 5 star!Review Date: 2008-11-11
Seriously, I did enjoy these books, and will be ordering the new one when it comes out, but Nigel, I mean "John", you are not a native American Chief, you take yourself far too seriously, chill out and have a beer.
Very Not GoodReview Date: 2008-08-14
I really can't understand the reviews that adore this book. I would say they must come from the least sophisticated of pulpy thriller readers and not the readers of even mediocre science fiction, who would expect more than this. But then I'm puzzled as to why the junky thriller readers would like this book, as there's nothing remotely thrilling about it. Seriously, there's almost no action, and the action there is poorly written, with the outcome rarely in question.
Dull, badly written, and lacking in authority. What more can I say, other than: One Star.
I'm not afraid. I'm not very afraid.Review Date: 2008-08-05
Then they will eat a danish. And skip to the next file.
If that description terrified you, then this book is the one for you. If you read it and thought, "Yeah, so?" then don't read The Traveler. Sadly, I fall into the "Yeah, so?" category, and so there was a fundamental disconnect all the way through this book. It's about an evil conspiracy, who call themselves the Brethren and who others call the Tabula -- because we couldn't decide on a name, could we, Mr. Twelve Hawks? -- who seek to turn the whole world into a Panopticon. This was a prison designed by the philosopher Jeremy Bentham a few hundred years ago, and the way the prison works, the prisoners can never know when they're being observed by guards, so they have to assume they're being watched all the time. Once you teach the prisoners that they always have to act as if the guards are watching, and that punishment for misbehavior is immediate and severe, then you don't actually need to watch them: they will make it a part of their natural behavior. Using the millions of cameras, and national ID tags and GPS chips in cars and phones and such, and the electronic trail we all leave, the Tabula are slowly teaching the world that we are always being watched.
And that would be frightening, except the Tabula doesn't plan to do anything but watch. Oh, they have a vague plan of making everybody the same and using mass entertainment to distract them and keep them docile while the Brethren rule, but they aren't going to do anything with their power except -- rule. And watch. Always watching. The author failed to take this evil world-dominating group to the next level: when they use their evil knowledge of everyone's habits and such to do evil things to them. The Tabula never do that, not even in the scenes when they use their evil knowledge to track people down. Sure, these guys are hard to hide from, but I'm not a Traveler or a Harlequin. Oh yeah, that's the rest of the book's plot: the greatest threat to the Tabula's control are people called Travelers, who can astrally project into alternate universes, and who use the perspective they gain to show people a better way to live. These Travelers, who conveniently include every major prophet and every influential person throughout history, are protected by cold-hearted killing machines called Harlequins. That's right, Harlequins. No, there's no reason for the name -- it just sounds really cool. Not true: there's a reason. But it's stupid, and the real reason for the name is, quite obviously, because it sounds really cool. The book's about the last two Travelers and the Tabula's attempts to find them, while one of the last Harlequins tries to protect them.
See, here's the issue. You can't actually control people by watching them. You also need to remove all influences that get people to act in ways that are counter to your uber-society's purpose. Because there will always be those people who are willing to be subversive, or just perverse, and fight against the machine. Even if they're being watched -- maybe sometimes because they're being watched, which is an even harder tendency to control in this watching world; how do you intimidate attention seekers by watching them? -- they will still do things you don't want, even if they get punished for them. Because our culture values rebellion and individuality, even now, even today. Our media-created images of what makes an individual are pretty screwed up, but we recognize them as screwed up, and we cherish those few individuals, either in public life or of our personal acquaintance, who seem to us like the real thing.
If you want to control people's hearts and minds, you need to do one of the three things laid out by the Big Three Dystopias: divide and conquer them through fear and double think as in 1984; control them with gene therapy and lots and lots of drugs as in Brave New World, or encourage them to drown in their own stupidity as in Fahrenheit 451. This book doesn't do any of those, though it has hints of all three. But the only thing it takes to a proper dystopian extreme is the invasiveness of cameras and electronic information tracking. And again, if all they're doing is watching us and writing down everything we do, a la Harriet the Spy, who cares? People have watched each other since the dawn of time: privacy has always been something of an illusion. How many books have described the small town atmosphere, where everyone knows everyone else's business? Or the crowding of big city life, where you're never really alone? So now the watchers have cameras and computers: so what? We're already being watched by our bosses, our neighbors, our families, our pets. A fear of that shows a level of paranoia that is more harmful than helpful -- and, might I add, feeds in to the real means used to control our populace, to whatever extent we are controlled: fear. This book gives a description of people living Off The Grid out of the watchers' view, and it sounds like an inordinate amount of hassle. And as the Harlequins in this book show us, when you put your effort into living Off The Grid, you don't really get to do anything useful, nor do you get to fight in the most subversive way: by having a happy life. The parts of the book that rang truest for me were the moments when the Harlequin character longed to give up the eternal struggle and just -- live. Happily, even if blissfully unaware of the people who are watching you and not doing anything to you. She should have done it: happiness is the true rebellion.
Wow, that's a whole lot more rant than it needed to be. But then, so was the book. In the end, the action scenes were okay, and the astral projection/Traveler scenes were better, but the characters were bad, the plot was shallow and silly, and the message was something I just don't buy -- the only thing it has going for it is the vague guilt I feel from imagining that I'm a tool of the system teaching people to scoff at the Vast Machine's control over us rather than helping them fight against it by following the wisdom of this book. But I won't give in to the mass-marketed subliminal influence of this book! You can't brainwash me into toeing your line, Twelve Hawks, can't use emotional control to get me to do as you think I should do, can't use your manipulative language and innuendo to make me believe you when you tell me who my enemy is! I will think for myself. And I think: meh.

An entertaining readReview Date: 2008-01-02
Murdoch and Maxwell,Review Date: 2007-10-25
Promising premise...disappointing executionReview Date: 2006-12-21
This book opens with nearly the same premise as Kane and Abel...two children born in very different circumstances on opposite sides of the globe who grow to become arch nemises. With expectations that we'd be treated to another K&A, this book fell short in numerous ways...so short that I lost interest partway through and just skipped to the end. For me, the main problem was the characters themselves - like two self-absorbed asteroids hurtling towards each other, I just really didn't care if they obliterated themselves in the end.
For those who know the industry, it isn't too hard to guess who Archer patterned his two media-mogul main characters after. They aren't the most lovable guys in the world, just like the characters in the book. Their business-is-war and take-no-prisoners attitude towards life and career isn't particularly endearing, and as a result, Archer managed to somehow give us two antagonists rather than dual protagonists as in Kane and Abel.
There are other Archer novels that far surpass this one, most notably "As the Crow Flies" and "Kane and Abel." I like much of Archer's work...just not this one.
Waste of TimeReview Date: 2006-10-14
Media Moguals - The Dark SideReview Date: 2004-12-12
Each character has their share of sleeze. Both were willing to do whatever it took to come out on top. But neither had the good sense to recognize when they should let it go... and let the other ruin each other.
Indeed, ask yourself before the end - which man deserves to triumph. The best of them, the worst of them, neither, or just one of them. The answer might not be what you think.

Used price: $2.62
Collectible price: $10.00

Invest a little, get a lotReview Date: 2008-11-14
A Must Read for everyone interested in protecting their investmentsReview Date: 2008-09-07
A Must Read!Review Date: 2007-12-06
AIM works. In two years I have the numbers to prove it. Everyone should read this book. I use AIM for maintaining my accounts but I use "Rule One Investing" by Phil Towne for picking them. It is a winning combination. Good bye to the old 'buy and hold' method!
Very Interesting and Highly Readable - Best for Conservative InvestorsReview Date: 2007-01-02
The best investment book you can readReview Date: 2006-12-26

Used price: $0.10

very disappointingReview Date: 2008-12-26
The Fizz Went FlatReview Date: 2008-12-11
I suppose that I need to get used to the concept of books-as-reality-television-series, in which the plot will go on and on and on until either the reader or the ratings are exhausted. Unfortunately, {insert unknown author's name} would have been better served wrapping his story up in one volume and then moving on to some other topic.
In this case, by the end of THE DARK RIVER there was really no end in sight. I don't know when the next book in the series is scheduled to come out, but given that it appears in bookstores by summer I'm afraid I'll opt out and mow the lawn instead of reading the book. Come to think of it, picking weeds seems like a more entertaining diversion.
love this bookReview Date: 2008-10-12
Keeps reader interested... Full of actionReview Date: 2008-10-01
The truth is that I read the book in less than a week... If you are an action lover, you definitely cannot stop reading this book... It is a never ending action...
Second, you can follow the story even if you don't know what happened in the first book... but it is not an independent book... at the end you get the feeling that... now what??... and I hate to realize that it's been 3 months and there is no answer to my question... because I have to wait the third book... that's the only thing I do not like... I need the book to have some kind of an ending... and this one definitely doesn't have one...
Now if you are the type of person that doesn't like action books... you will definitely do not like this, as there is no break on action in it...
It lacks some explanations of how the author views some stuff... but I believe it is at the discretion of the author to leaves some mystery around...
Finally, the spoiler is that the title makes no sense until.... :) ok I am not going to spoil it... :)
Not even the FIRSTReview Date: 2008-10-25
As a book fiend, a scifi maven, and an omnivore of fiction its rare that I find a book that is...well...mush. This is mush. The crystalline edges of technology that drive good scifi plots forward are sort of soft and drippy here.
Even the premise is so... so wrong.
Scifi authors should have some grounding in science... without that, its simply fiction.
Used price: $11.49
Collectible price: $30.00

the ending was foolishReview Date: 2006-04-16
Awesome, engaging, uniqueReview Date: 2005-12-31
Good Writing; Absurd Plotting Review Date: 2008-10-31
This novel reminded me heavily of the work of Richard North Patterson - like Patterson, Pottinger is heavily interested in political issues, and THE FOURTH PROCEDURE essentially serves as an excuse for Pottinger to explore the abortion issue in depth. Pottinger is very strongly pro-choice, although this fact isn't entirely clear until the last fifth of the novel or so.
This novel has a lot of different characters, and while many of them are colorful, very few of them are likable. Most of them are intensely ideological and exist only to represent a certain point of view. As a result, I didn't really have that much of an emotional investment in this novel, although I found much of the dialogue to be quite intelligent and clever.
What really kills THE FOURTH PROCEDURE is an absurd plot twist at the very end, which is so blatantly ridiculous that I found myself laughing at the resolution. Whatever your position, abortion is a complex issue, and this novel's approach is insulting to anyone who approaches moral issues in a balanced, thoughtful manner. Still, if you're an ardent pro-choicer who believes that all anti-abortion people are closet misogynists, you may get a kick out of this book's conclusion, which is certainly original. But if you're a fan of realistic plotting, I almost guarantee you will be disappointed.
In short, this thriller is a well written debut, but its plot deficiencies make it subpar.
Let downReview Date: 2005-05-02
However somewhere along the line the author seems unsure whether he is writing a medical/legal/crime or science fiction novel. The characters have little flesh and blood and evoke little deep emotion. The events fit together too smugly and the conversations are often awkward. And the pseudoscience spoils it all. Forced male pregnancy to make men rethink their views on abortion? A long shot and unfortunately one that fails badly.
Oh! The Irony!Review Date: 2004-04-06
Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $10.00

It was pretty good...Review Date: 2006-05-30
what a tankerReview Date: 2007-10-01
One particularly irritating facet of this book was that the few women in it are in very minor roles, even the Vice President, and are invariably described in terms of their sex lives.
As for the plot being "parallel" to our current troubles in the Middle East and with terrorism, these problems are nothing new and have been around in various forms for decades. The US isn't known for learning from its mistakes.
This is the only book that I have ever thrown into the trash. I read it on a plane and tossed it into a trash can on my way to the baggage claim. It felt great.
A Rather Strange CompositionReview Date: 2005-03-27
Otherwise, the book held my interest, but it did not impress me whatsoever. Some (read: much) of the plot was predictable, some of it developed before certain facts were reavealed, etc.
One of Puzzo's finest: Plenty of political and international intrigue. Review Date: 2006-12-15
During Holy Week it seems as if the world is falling apart at the seems. The Pontiff has been assasinated, and FXK's daughter has been kidnapped by Muslim extremists and then executed in cold blood.
FXK devises a response that he feels is commensurate with the crimes committed, and one that is befitting defending the honor of the most powerful nation on earth. There is one little snag; an imperial congress, motivated purely by greed,political opportunism, and a visceral hatred for the CINC,is poised to declare him non compus mentis and have him impeached.
An incident of 9/11 proportions takes place in New York that changes the entire dynamic of this political opportunism/intrigue and FXK adresses an emergency session of a join-session of Congress, and is spared the ignominy of being removed from office. Puzo's prescience here is uncanny; a nation in crisis after a terrorist event, a zealous President/Justice Department eager to preserve the Union, to the point of using draconian measures...it is all there, prophetically so. Eerie.
Puzo spins a yarn like no other. His scenarios/character; development/plots, sub-plots are woven into an exciting, breathtaking tapestry that takes the reader on a roller-coaster ride; the thrill of a lifetime. There are so many twists and turns it is likely to give a less engaged reader the literary equivalent of motion sickness. Dialogue is crisp, sometimes raw, and cynical. The stuff a poltical thriller is made of.
Some have decried this work as being a little contrived, but Puzo has a knack for tying up all of the loose ends and leaving the reader satisfied after he/she has read the novel.
A first-class piece of literature.
A book only worth reading...Review Date: 2005-04-12

Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $10.00

echoes of the fourth magicReview Date: 2008-10-12
WitchcraftReview Date: 2007-05-25
Worst R. A. book so farReview Date: 2002-04-30
Good, but not his best.Review Date: 2003-04-04
Captain Mitchell, Reinheiser, Doc Brady, Billy Shank, and Jeffry DelGiudice "Del" found themselves to be the ancient ones who were prophesied to come and change the world.
The race of Man had destroyed themselves. Four humans were chosen by a being to become wizards
to help the world in its change.
Brielle, the Emerald Witch of the Woods.
Ardaz, the Silver Mage.
Istaahl, the White
Mage.
Thalasi, the Black Warlock.
The world now consisted of elves, known as Moon Dancers, and misshapen lizard beasts
known as Talons.
The Ancient Ones, battling amongst themselves, joined the new races to help battle the Black Warlock and his gruesome Talons before all good and the entire race of Moon Dancers were destroyed forever!
**** I found the beginning to be very slow. But after the first few chapters, the story picked up and held onto me. I understand it to be the first of a trilogy or series, but I am not sure. Salvatore fans will NOT be disappointed. However, expect a Sci-Fi, instead of a Fantasy, for the beginning to set up the plot.
First impression, best impression.Review Date: 2001-03-10


A bright shining truthReview Date: 2008-12-01
The Fourth Order Review Date: 2008-11-10
NEVER ORDER BOOKS FROM GRASSROOTS BOOKS INC EVEN IF AMAZON IS STUPID ENOUGH TO ALLOW THEM TO SELL MERCHANDISE ON THEIR SITE.
UnlikeableReview Date: 2007-12-07
Also, the big themes of torture, civil liberties, freedom, are barely explored through the characters.
Give it a pass.
This author is always fun to readReview Date: 2007-11-05
Not worth picking up Review Date: 2007-12-19


Our Bead Society Loves ItReview Date: 1999-03-10
Too many duplications in this bookReview Date: 2001-12-14
Helpful... but definitely not "complete"...Review Date: 2001-05-26
While I realize that stores do come and go in this industry, I have found quite a few stores (six to be exact, and counting) in the San Diego area that are not in this book... wonderful stores with TONS of beads that have been in business many years in the same location... yet... they are not included in the "The Complete Bead Resource Book".
If you're looking for an all-around general listing of bead resources, it would be way cheaper to search the internet, or your local yellow pages.
A Big HelpReview Date: 2000-08-30
very good bookReview Date: 1999-11-04
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
Probably the most important aspect of this book is that it was published by Avon in all haste, immediately following the shootings. In fact, the text is conveyed in a manual typewriter font and typos are rampant. The 160 pages are hand-numbered and cut-and-paste photocopies of contemporary newspaper accounts make up facets of the work. There are some pretty good black-and-white (non-professional) photos of activities during the week of the fateful incident, including a shot of the burned ROTC building.
Warren assembled anecdotal accounts of various students and faculty members so the story is told mostly from that perspective, rather than from that of the officials who chiefly gave rise to the shootings.
If you are unfamiliar with the incident, riots were popping up here and there on college campuses (and elsewhere) during the late 60s and early 70s across the nation in protest of the Vietnam War. President Nixon had recently expanded the war into Laos and Cambodia which helped to feed the flames.
Due mostly to some broken windows of businesses caused by students in the small Ohio town of Kent, and also to the burning of the University's ROTC building, conservative Republican Governor James A. Rhodes (at the behest of the Kent mayor) sent in the National Guard to quell the problem. The Guardsmen were poorly prepared for the task -- they were mostly untrained and they had just come off duty from dealing with a truckers' strike and so they were pretty much tired out. They were additionally led by a pretty hard-core commander who was clearly not fond of college students.
On May 4th, in a panic of sorts, some of the Guardsmen opened fire with live ammunition on a large group of students, some of whom were protesting on the Campus' Commons area and a tragic historical event thus became manifest.
After the shootings, (I was attending college in Ohio at the time but not at Kent State), everyone had an opinion -- there was no middle ground. Folks either hated the students and said that more of them should have been shot, or, they hated Governor Rhodes and President Nixon (who, by the way, despised Jim Rhodes for this debacle) for causing the deaths of the students. A lot of people on both sides gave the National Guardsmen, who did the actual firing, a bit of a pass and blamed their leadership for the tragedy.
The written accounts of the students are about what one would expect. They contain many interesting insights which are all but lost now. The commentary of faculty members is more inflammatory in nature and I was surprised at their lack of writing competence, sometimes using certain words incorrectly. But Kent State was not Harvard. It was a state college for mostly middle-class students, so certain faculty members were not necessarily the top people in their respective fields. One also has to take into account that the adrenalin was no doubt still flowing and these faculty members likely had difficulty in containing their personal anger and grief as they wrote out their views on the incident.
If one weeds out the loaded language within the text, s/he can glean out a pretty fair account of what actually happened. Each of the stories exudes a primal, guttural truth, mostly because these testimonials were garnered so soon subsequent to the tragedy.
Don't look for professional essays here -- but if you want to know the whys and hows of the Kent State Shootings then I can highly recommend this book to you.